noticed that there is many producer that their mix is Crisp and nice. but their Music still Sucks.
whats your thoughts about it ?
I am in the good track school of thought but really both are equally important - I suppose if I was rich and famous I would get some one else to mix it for me - but that ain’t going to happen 
good track, i’ve got some really cool tracks that suck on the mix down and mastering but still really love them 
Good track, because a good track can always be mixed.
Where as it doesn’t matter how good the mix down, a bad track is still a bad track.
I agree - good track. Whats the point in having a clean crisp mix if the track is poor. A good track has emotion and feel and makes you want to dance, a clean crisp mix of a poor track will not have the desired effect that dance music requires.
A good Mix.
I dont like Music. 
both! you can hace a great track but will sound like ****e it the mix it ****e! even more so in trance!
[quote]gofunk (15/10/2010)[hr]both! you can hace a great track but will sound like ****e it the mix it ***e! even more so in trance![/quote]
You’re fcked then 
:laugh:
Uhhhh, both.
great track any day. mix could be perfect but be horrible music… doesnt exactly give me a tent pole
One will make the other, if your tracks are good you can build a good set.
then again i made good sets with crappy traks, loopt the **** out of it, threw on loads of effects on the mixer and went ballistic. retorical question, makes one think…
[quote]howiegroove (15/10/2010)[hr]Uhhhh, both.[/quote]
well yeah obviously both is great but in the case of which “one” would you prefer you have to choose ONE lol
[quote]jon_fisher (16/10/2010)[hr][quote]howiegroove (15/10/2010)[hr]Uhhhh, both.[/quote]
well yeah obviously both is great but in the case of which “one” would you prefer you have to choose ONE lol ;)[/quote]
Uhhhh, both.
At the moment I choose the ‘none’ option in my productions